Intel has been busy preparing and launching the new Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Ultra 5 250K Plus this week, leaving speculation as to where the Ultra 9 counterpart might be — after all, we saw leaked benchmarks of the flagship part a month ago. Intel confirmed to PCGamesHardware that it has scrapped the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and won't be releasing the chip. Furthermore, Intel also stated it is scrapping a potential Special Edition Ultra 9 SKU for the Arrow Lake generation as well.
Go deeper with TH Premium: CPU
But to give you an idea of its performance, previous benchmark leaks revealed that the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus was around 10-11% faster than the 285K in Geekbench 6 benchmarks. This shouldn't be interpreted as the actual performance difference between the two chips in real-world applications, but it gives us an idea of the 290K Plus' potential performance. We are also unsure if iBOT was enabled or not on the 290K either.
Article continues below
No Core Ultra 9 285K/295K Plus Special Edition
Ditching a Special Edition part for Arrow Lake is arguably more surprising than ditching the 290K Plus. Intel has consistently released a Special Edition "KS" flagship every generation for the past several years. Intel first began shipping Special Edition chips with the Core i9-9900KS in 2019, skipped the 10th and 11th generations, then produced the i9-12900KS, i9-13900KS, and i9-14900KS. Intel again did not share its decision to cancel its "KS" product for Arrow Lake, but one reason could be that the 285K couldn't consistently hit 6 GHz; a mark previous KS releases have been able to surpass.
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus debuted this week as quite possibly Intel's last CPUs on the LGA 1851 socket. The new chips focus on improving the criticisms of Intel's previous Arrow-Lake S products, featuring higher clock speeds, four more E-cores, and a much lower MSRP compared to their vanilla Ultra 7 and Ultra 5 counterparts. The cherry on top is hardware integration for Intel's new iBOT tool that can boost IPC by solving inefficiencies in instructions sent to the CPU cores.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

5 hours ago
5








English (US) ·