A Florida county discovered 14 Flock cameras nobody authorized, and 11 remain unclaimed

What we know so far: Flock's AI-powered surveillance cameras have already drawn widespread controversy even when authorities fully disclose their deployment. Communities across the US are canceling contracts with the company due to concerns over privacy and police abuse. However, in some areas, officials have found more cameras than were authorized and don't always know who is watching through them.

The latest case of unclaimed Flock cameras occurred in St. Lucie County, Florida. When officials began taking down the cameras after canceling the county's contract with the company, they discovered 14 extra cameras that the police say were not theirs.

The St. Lucie County's contract with Flock authorized 52 cameras, but officials found 66. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office eventually admitted that three of the extra automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) were theirs but didn't explain how or why they deployed them without a permit, leaving 11 that no one, including the county's other two police departments, has claimed.

ALPRs like those from Flock and Axon use AI to read license plates from passing vehicles and automatically sort them into a searchable database, which authorities can use to track movements. When the cameras flag license plates connected to crimes or investigations (sometimes in error), officers can stop and search the vehicles without a warrant.

Obvious worries about mass surveillance have prompted hundreds of communities across the US to end their contracts with Flock, though it claims new contracts far outpace cancelations. Another concern is misuse by police – dozens of officers have been caught using ALPRs for stalking. In many places, citizens have taken it upon themselves to destroy the cameras.

St. Lucie County has covered the unclaimed cameras in plastic for the time being, attaching notices that officials will remove them in 30 days, a deadline that could expire between October 16 and October 20. One camera has already mysteriously disappeared, according to The Washington Post.

Concerningly, Flock cameras aren't necessarily exclusive to police departments and don't always require government permits. While Flock usually conducts permit negotiations and installations, private companies can sign contracts with the manufacturer, and a spokesperson confirmed they can place ALPRs in certain locations without permits.

Flock has installed cameras in several other states and communities without permits over the past few years, some on behalf of unknown clients. When Grass Valley, California, recently removed its ALPRs, Flock reinstalled some of them without informing officials.

In response to pushback, the company has placed greater restrictions on police database searches. By the end of the year, searches will require entering case numbers, but authorities can bypass the step in emergencies. A Florida congressman also recently introduced a bill that would require warrants to use ALPRs.