‘Scream 7’ Review: Do You Like… Sh*tty Movies?

The most damning thing about “Scream 7” isn’t that it’s bad. Horror franchises survive lackluster installments all the time. What makes the seventh Ghostface mystery uniquely dispiriting is how openly afraid it is of its own history, audience, studio, and release. Marketed as a triumphant return to form and positioned as a nostalgic corrective move for Paramount after a year of public controversy, director Kevin Williamson’s latest lands like a corporate gesture that misunderstands both the franchise he created and the horror landscape it inhabits now. 

Even measured against other high-stakes slasher movies, “Scream 7” is coming out under unusual scrutiny. After the last sequel proved the series could survive without its original final girl, Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell, who passed on that film over a reported pay dispute), “Scream 7” brings her back anyway in a desperate attempt to distract fans from, yes, the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Fans gathered outside the world premiere in Los Angeles to protest the contentious dismissal of “Scream 6” star Melissa Barrera, who was removed after posting pro-Palestinian comments on social media.

But pricey reassurance can smother satire, and that’s a key element both “Scream” and Williamson’s career once thrived on. What the director delivers here, after writing the original film and two sequels (“Scream 2,” “Scream 4”), is a poorly constructed story that confuses reverence for relevance and repetition for insight. Co-written with Guy Busick from a story by Busick and James Vanderbilt, who did far better writing the last two “Scream” chapters, the script Williamson wound up is straightforward to the point of stultification — and Sidney isn’t stupid. 

“Scream 7”©Paramount/Courtesy Everett Collection

Disgraced here but once great, the beloved scream queen comes back to her franchise by way of a new small town called Pine Grove. She’s relocated there with her dorky cop husband (Joel McHale) to raise their teenage daughter, Tatum (Isabel May), hoping to cozy up to some domesticated calm after decades of hack-and-slash trauma. But when a new Ghostface begins targeting the younger generation, old allies from Woodsboro drift back into orbit, and the machinery of the “Scream” whodunit lurches forward like a contractual obligation.

From the start, this new setting feels like a generic placeholder rather than the iconic New York City landscape of “Scream 6” — or the lived-in haunted-house effect of other genre films. Characters move between locations (coffee shop, high school theater, bar, coffee shop!) through a maze of assorted cookie-cutter homes that lack spatial logic and narrative memory. Where Woodsboro functioned as a character in its own right as a cursed world shaped by winking violence and cyclical paranoia, “Scream 7” finds an incoherent network of dimly lit sets. The geography doesn’t build tension, and the clues suffer as a result. When deaths occur, they don’t ripple outward so much as disappear into the gloom. 

The ensemble, peppered with surprise cameos, doesn’t help much. Fresh faces appear as sketches rather than people as “Scream 7” populates with a chatty neighbor (Anna Camp), her true crime-obsessed son (Asa Germann), a bitchy drama teacher (Timothy Simons, amusing but underused), an immediately suspicious boyfriend for Tatum (Sam Rechner), and more of the teen girl’s peers (McKenna Grace, Celeste O’Connor). The connective tissue between characters who should already know each other feels strained, and the arrival of fan favorite Gale Weathers (Courteney Cox) and scene-stealing siblings Mindy (Jasmin Savoy Brown) and Chad Meeks-Martin (Mason Gooding) underlines how little chemistry exists in these new hunting grounds. The seams of a costly rewrite are obvious, but worse than its messiness is its odd indifference to emotion. You’ll struggle to remember who died, let alone care about who did it.

Sidney herself is the clearest symbol of the film’s confusion, despite Campbell’s efforts. “Scream 7” gestures toward the well-worn trope of therapy-informed parenting, but can’t find anything valuable or funny enough to say about the subject. Scenes meant to convey fondness and dramatic weight instead flatten into thoughtless repetition, as the series’ decades-long dissection of the final girl reveals itself as a stale brand asset. 

That hollowness extends to many of the acting performances. The cast is stuck with material so lifeless it borders on punitive. Deadpan lines land sporadically at best, and the friction between Sidney and her daughter never sparks. Rather than evolving the franchise’s teen archetypes, “Scream 7” barely sketches the surface and leaves Sidney mostly stranded in that desert.  

‘Scream 7’©Paramount/Courtesy Everett Collection

Technically speaking, the movie is just competent enough to be frustrating. The cinematography does its job, but the editing lacks bite, and the sound design is actively disorienting. Musical cues swing wildly from choral eeriness to dead silence to pulsing synths without any discernible logic, frequently robbing scenes of rhythm and dread. The violence follows suit. After a brutal and solid opening, Ghostface settles into monotony. Weapons appear without imagination, surprises blur together, and the staging feels lacking in basic conviction. 

Staged inside the original Macher house (now reimagined as a true-crime walkthrough attraction), the cold open is the only part of “Scream 7” that hints at what it could have been. The idea of “real” Ghostface fans literally walking through the first movie’s climactic scene is smart, and the actors (Jimmy Tatro, Michelle Randolph) sell it with genuine presence. It’s the one time where “Scream” history is interrogated rather than worshipped, but the ill-advised saga never reaches that level again.

Williamson’s greatest failure comes in the film’s relationship to meta-commentary. Once the series’ calling card, self-awareness has here been dulled into self-soothing. “Scream 7” behaves as though the defining anxiety of modern horror is yearning for the “good old days,” ignoring a genre and audience that’s currently energized by artistic risk, bold reinvention, and tangible daily fear. In a cinematic landscape where period vampire epics (“Sinners”) and microbudget video game experiments (“Iron Lung”) can coexist as prestige genre fare, this retreat feels especially out of touch.

‘Scream 7’©Paramount/Courtesy Everett Collection

“Scream 7” refuses to joke about itself, and that’s an unwise choice for a franchise built on confrontation. The anxiety of studio oversight is palpable, but that doesn’t mean Williamson and his co-writers were right to abandon their duty to provoke. This feels like a movie made by artists afraid of their employers as much as their consumers and unsure which group might turn on them first.

Nostalgia, in the end, isn’t this sequel’s theme but its shield. It doesn’t erase the franchise’s highs, but nevertheless stains the canon with a fraught production nightmare that will be remembered as unnecessary. Horror can’t work without bravery, on and off screen. But “Scream 7” mistook safety for survival, and in doing so, coughed up the least dangerous Ghostface yet.

Grade: D+

From Paramount Pictures, “Scream 7” is in theaters on February 27.

Want to stay up to date on IndieWire’s film reviews and critical thoughts? Subscribe here to our newly launched newsletter, In Review by David Ehrlich, in which our Chief Film Critic and Head Reviews Editor rounds up the best new reviews and streaming picks along with some exclusive musings — all only available to subscribers.