Only 3 Action Movies Are More Extreme Than 'Crank'

1 week ago 9

Jason Statham as Chev Chelios pointing his finger like a gun in Crank (2006)

Published May 23, 2026, 9:41 AM EDT

Jeremy has more than 2500 published articles on Collider to his name, and has been writing for the site since February 2022. He's an omnivore when it comes to his movie-watching diet, so will gladly watch and write about almost anything, from old Godzilla films to gangster flicks to samurai movies to classic musicals to the French New Wave to the MCU... well, maybe not the Disney+ shows.
His favorite directors include Martin Scorsese, Sergio Leone, Akira Kurosawa, Quentin Tarantino, Werner Herzog, John Woo, Bob Fosse, Fritz Lang, Guillermo del Toro, and Yoji Yamada. He's also very proud of the fact that he's seen every single Nicolas Cage movie released before 2022, even though doing so often felt like a tremendous waste of time. He's plagued by the question of whether or not The Room is genuinely terrible or some kind of accidental masterpiece, and has been for more than 12 years (and a similar number of viewings).
When he's not writing lists - and the occasional feature article - for Collider, he also likes to upload film reviews to his Letterboxd profile (username: Jeremy Urquhart) and Instagram account.
He has achieved his 2025 goal of reading all 13,467 novels written by Stephen King, and plans to spend the next year or two getting through the author's 82,756 short stories and 105,433 novellas.

Crank exists in a weird kind of limbo, at the moment. It was a movie that came out in 2006, and so it’s potentially old enough to start feeling nostalgic, but also maybe not quite. This is based more on nostalgia from the 1980s really peaking in the 2010s, and maybe also in the sense that something has to be at least a quarter of a century old before it can be deemed a classic… though that’s more a vibe, and an estimate. There’s no agreed-upon amount of time, and the idea of a nostalgia cycle is also kind of up for debate. Anyway, Crank obviously isn't new enough to be an exciting/truly modern release, and is not really old enough to be a traditional classic, and it’s also probably not quite good enough to be a classic anyway, even if it were old enough. It’s got no interest in being a traditional classic, though. It’s a movie with an incredible and ridiculous premise, seeing as it involves a man who gets poisoned with a strange drug that requires him to keep adrenaline pumping through his body if he wants to stay alive.

So, he does a series of alarming things to keep adrenaline high while trying to find someone who might have an antidote, and that quest also involves getting revenge on the people who injected him with the drug in the first place. It’s got a perfectly-cast Jason Statham rampaging his way around, looking very angry, and somehow balancing being sort of cool, more than a little silly, and then very slightly funny in a self-aware kind of way, all at once. Crank has excuses to get extreme with its content, given what the protagonist is required to do throughout, and many opportunities to do something crude, violent, or profane (or all of the above) are taken. Crank is, however, topped in its extremeness by a few other noteworthy action movies from cinema history, including a very obvious pick (the sequel, which will be gotten to and elaborated on shortly), one other movie that came out about a decade after the Crank films, and then a film that came out more than 20 years before the first Crank. If you’ve seen this Jason Statham movie and want something that might scratch the same itch – and, beyond that, actually scratch that itch even harder – then the following titles are very much worth watching.

3 'Crank: High Voltage' (2009)

Turns out you can’t kill Chev Chelios, the main character of Crank, even if that 2006 movie did appear to show him dying at the end. You’d expect as much, given how long he was falling for, before he hit the ground, in Crank (2006), but the sequel, Crank: High Voltage, sets an early precedent for being much more gonzo by merely existing. He’s brought back to life, and has his heart stolen and then replaced with an artificial one, and then he sets off on another wild mission to get his heart back, all the while continually electrocuting himself because that’s the only thing that’ll keep his artificial heart going. More disbelief must be suspended than was necessary in the already outlandish first Crank, as Crank: High Voltage really does feel like it wants to be more ridiculous, crass, and over-the-top in just about every way. In terms of escalating things to ludicrous new heights, you do kind of have to admire it. Anything goes, or even beyond that, maybe too much goes here, in a way.

More disbelief must be suspended than was necessary in the already outlandish first Crank, as Crank: High Voltage really does feel like it wants to be more ridiculous, crass, and over-the-top in just about every way.

The dark sense of humor found in much of the first movie is a lot broader here, so even if the humor might seem darker, it’s all pushed to an extreme to a point where Crank: High Voltage feels much more like an outright comedy. It’s also very much offensive, and felt so back in 2009, just feeling a little more extreme by today’s standards. Not that certain places this movie goes were necessarily acceptable back then, but you probably couldn’t get away with making a film starring Jason Statham with this kind of content depicted in this sort of way today, and whether that makes the film more worthy of being “cherished” or not is entirely subjective. It’s a time capsule of the 2000s, in like a heightened way that felt almost like an ahead-of-its-time parody, and it feels that way arguably more than Crank (2006). As to the specific things that happen here, it would go beyond the bounds of what’s typically acceptable to write in an article if they were elaborated on too much here. There are a lot of crude sexual scenes, the violence is all very gruesome (and near-constant), Jason Statham swears persistently (at least he’s very good at it), and the film’s screenplay seeks to make fun of – and possibly offend – pretty much everyone. It’s exhausting, and yet that’s sort of the point, so it’s a “just take it or leave it” kind of situation.

2 'The Night Comes for Us' (2018)

Probably the least potentially offensive movie of all the ones being mentioned here (including the original Crank), The Night Comes for Us instead earns its spot among the most extreme action movies of all time for just how violent that action is. It’s easy, and also a little fun, to compare this to The Raid and The Raid 2, especially because the film’s stars, Joe Taslim, Iko Uwais, and Julie Estelle, all had roles in at least one of those martial arts movies. The Night Comes for Us isn't quite as graceful as a martial arts movie, nor is the fight choreography as good as much of what you'll find in both The Raid and The Raid 2, but it carves its own identity, in a way, by having many people get carved up, thrown around, and generally brutalized. It’s like a slasher movie, but instead of a lone killer going around and killing people in elaborate ways, there are a handful of prominent characters who can all cause the kind of damage slasher villains do, and they go up against each other sometimes, or they take on thoroughly outmatched henchmen (and henchladies… “henchpeople?”).

That’s a lot of rambling about The Night Comes for Us without mentioning its plot, but also, what plot? This is sort of about an ex-criminal trying to redeem himself by saving a young girl from some dangerous people, but then those dangerous people really escalate their attempts to get the young girl, and violence keeps on escalating from that point onward. There are many moving pieces here for such a simple core narrative, and The Night Comes for Us can genuinely get sort of convoluted, with more side characters here than is really necessary, unless they're necessary insofar as we wouldn’t get as many fight scenes if there weren’t so many people who needed to be fought. But the flimsy story being there as an excuse for action works, because the action is mostly satisfying, and, yes, memorable because of how brutal it is. It’s the sort of violence you'd expect to see in a gnarly horror movie, copied and pasted, somehow, into the framework of what might otherwise be a barebones martial arts movie. Anyway, if you like intense martial arts movies, and don’t mind some truly gruesome violence, it’s probably worth a watch.

1 'The Boxer's Omen' (1983)

If the goal was to make a movie that’s genuinely impossible to watch while eating, then The Boxer’s Omen is a rousing success, and maybe even a full-blown masterpiece. There are some of the most disgusting sights here you'll ever see in a movie, especially an action movie, although The Boxer’s Omen is also a horror film, so the gross-out stuff makes a little more sense when you take that into account. The more you try to say about what happens in this movie, narratively speaking, the more confusing it'll sound, but to have a stab at doing that, this is sort of about the brother of a boxer who wants to avenge him after a terrible injury suffered in the ring. Revenge in a martial arts movie is often to be expected, but then things go off the deep end before too long, and The Boxer’s Omen introduces some pretty extreme supernatural elements, and from there, things get progressively nastier.

It’s a gross-out martial arts horror movie, and there aren’t too many of them, and if there were, it’s very likely that none would be able to compete with The Boxer’s Omen in terms of extremity. Almost anything violent that could happen to someone probably will happen to someone at some point in this film, and there are all sorts of scenes with dead things, body parts, and animals that are also nauseating. It’s just non-stop. It is, like the Crank movies, overwhelming, and though The Night Comes for Us was also intense and extreme with its violence, The Boxer’s Omen exceeds it in shock value because of its horror elements, and also because it’s unapologetically sexually charged at points, too. You get a real smorgasbord of things to be surprised – and possibly grossed out by – here, and it does have to be stressed, once more, that this really is a one-of-a-kind sort of film.

Collider Exclusive · Action Hero Quiz Which Action Hero Would Be
Your Perfect Partner? Rambo · James Bond · Indiana Jones · John McClane · Ethan Hunt

Five legends. Five completely different ways of getting out alive — with style, with muscle, with charm, with luck, or with a plan so intricate it probably shouldn't work. Ten questions will reveal which action hero was built to have your back.

🎖️Rambo

🍸James Bond

🏺Indiana Jones

🔧John McClane

🎭Ethan Hunt

FIND YOUR PARTNER →

You're dropped into a dangerous situation with no warning. What do you need most from a partner? The first few seconds tell you everything about who belongs beside you.

ASomeone who already has three contingency plans running and is calmly working through all of them. BSomeone who reads the terrain instinctively and knows exactly how to use it against the enemy. CSomeone who keeps their nerve and their sense of humour when everything is falling apart. DSomeone who knows the history of wherever we are and what we're walking into. ESomeone with the right contact, the right cover identity, and the right exit already arranged.

NEXT QUESTION →

You have to get somewhere dangerous, fast. How do you travel? How you get there is half the mission.

AOn foot through terrain no one else would attempt — I move where vehicles can't follow. BOn a motorcycle, a cargo plane, or anything else that gets me there before I think too hard about it. CIn something that belongs to someone else — borrowed, stolen, or improvised under fire. DFirst class, with a cover identity and a gadget that does something I won't explain until it's needed. EBy whatever means are available — I've driven, flown, and once arrived by camel. The destination matters, not the method.

NEXT QUESTION →

You're pinned down and outnumbered. What does your ideal partner do? This is when you find out what someone is really made of.

ADisappears into the environment, flanks them silently, and ends it before I've reloaded. BCracks a one-liner, grabs a fire extinguisher or a chair, and improvises something that somehow works. CProduces a gadget specifically designed for this exact scenario and uses it with infuriating precision. DPulls out a whip, a pistol, and an archaeological insight that somehow gets us out alive. ENeutralises the threat with maximum efficiency and minimum words — they were already three moves ahead.

NEXT QUESTION →

The mission is paused. You have one evening to decompress. What does your partner suggest? Who someone is when the pressure drops is who they actually are.

AA bar with terrible lighting, cold beer, and absolutely no questions about feelings. BThe finest restaurant in the city, a bottle of something expensive, and a conversation that is equal parts brilliant and exhausting. CA local dig site, a museum after hours, or a long story about why that particular artefact matters to human civilisation. DPizza. Bad TV. Falling asleep halfway through a movie neither of you were watching anyway. EA debrief that turns into three hours of contingency planning that somehow becomes the most fun you've had all week.

NEXT QUESTION →

How do you prefer your partner to communicate mid-mission? Good communication is the difference between partners and a liability.

APrecise and minimal — tell me what I need to know and nothing else. Every word has a cost. BDeadpan and dry — keeping it light keeps me sharp, even when everything is on fire. CEnthusiastic and slightly chaotic — but always with useful information buried somewhere in the noise. DCalm and controlled through an earpiece, with a plan that covers every variable I haven't thought of yet. EBarely at all — silence is a language and they speak it fluently.

NEXT QUESTION →

Your enemy is powerful, well-resourced, and has the upper hand. How should your partner approach them? The approach to the enemy defines the partnership.

AInfiltrate their inner circle, learn everything, and dismantle them from inside out before they know we're there. BStudy the historical pattern — every villain of this type has a weakness written somewhere in the past. CGet them talking. The more they monologue, the more time I have to figure out how to beat them. DGo through them. Directly. With as much force as the terrain allows. EFind the one thing they haven't accounted for — there's always one thing — and make sure we're holding it.

NEXT QUESTION →

Things go badly wrong and you're captured. What do you trust your partner to do? Who someone is when you need them most is the only thing that matters.

ACome in alone, quietly, and get me out before anyone knows they were there. BHave already been working on the extraction since the moment I disappeared — the plan is already running. CCome in loud, come in fast, and worry about the collateral damage later — I'd do the same for them. DUse every resource, every contact, and bend every rule until I'm out — they don't leave people behind. ECharm their way in somehow, bluff through the hard part, and still manage to look good doing it.

NEXT QUESTION →

What does your ideal partner bring to the table that you couldn't replace? A great partner fills the gap you didn't know you had.

ATechnology that shouldn't exist yet and the training to use it under any conditions. BSurvival instinct so refined it borders on supernatural — and the scars to prove it's been tested. CKnowledge of history, language, and culture that makes them invaluable in places where force is useless. DThe ability to walk into any room in the world and immediately become the most trusted person in it. EStubbornness that refuses to accept a situation is hopeless — and the improvisational skill to back it up.

NEXT QUESTION →

Every partnership has a cost. Which of these can you live with? No one comes without baggage. The question is whether you can carry it together.

AA partner who never fully switches off — always watching exits, always calculating threats, even at dinner. BA partner who gets the job done brilliantly but has the emotional availability of a locked filing cabinet. CA partner who makes everything ten times more complicated than it needs to be — but who always comes through. DA partner who gets personally attached to every relic, ruin, and artefact we encounter, which slows everything down. EA partner who was not built for this and knows it — but shows up anyway, every time, without being asked.

NEXT QUESTION →

It's the final moment. Everything is on the line. What do you need from your partner right now? The last question is the most honest one.

AOne line. Absolutely dry. Delivered like the world isn't ending. Then we move. BNothing said at all — just a look that means we both already know what has to happen. CA plan I don't fully understand that somehow accounts for everything, delivered in thirty seconds flat. DA piece of historical context that reframes the entire situation and tells us exactly what to do next. ESomeone who steps forward instead of back — because that's who they've always been.

REVEAL MY PARTNER →

Your Partner Has Been Assigned Your Perfect Partner Is…

Your answers have pointed to one action hero above all others. This is the person built to have your back — for better or considerably, spectacularly worse.

Rambo

Your partner doesn't talk much, doesn't need to, and will have assessed every threat in your immediate environment before you've finished your first sentence. John Rambo is not a man of plans or politics — he is a force of nature shaped by survival, loyalty, and a capacity for endurance that goes beyond anything training can produce. He will not leave you behind. He has never left anyone behind who deserved to come home. What you get with Rambo is the most capable, most quietly ferocious partner imaginable — one who has been through things that would have broken anyone else, and who chose to keep going anyway. You'll never need to ask if he has your back. You'll just know.

James Bond

Your partner will arrive perfectly dressed, perfectly briefed, and with a cover story so convincing it'll take you a moment to remember what's actually true. James Bond is the most professionally dangerous person in any room he enters — and the most disarmingly charming, which is the point. He operates in a world of layers, where nothing is what it appears and every advantage is used without apology. You'll never be bored. You'll occasionally be furious. But when it matters — when the mission is genuinely on the line and the margin for error has collapsed to nothing — Bond is exactly the partner you want. He has survived things that have no business being survivable. He does it with style. That is not nothing.

Indiana Jones

Your partner will know the history, the language, the cultural context, and exactly why the thing everyone else is ignoring is actually the most important thing in the room. Indiana Jones is brilliant, reckless, and occasionally impossible — but he is also one of the most resourceful, most genuinely knowledgeable partners you could find yourself beside. He approaches every situation with a scholar's eye and a brawler's instinct, which is an unusual combination and a remarkably effective one. He hates snakes and gets personally attached to objects of historical significance, both of which will slow you down at least once. It doesn't matter. What Indy brings is irreplaceable — and the adventures you'll have together will be the kind people write books about. Assuming you survive them.

John McClane

Your partner was not supposed to be here. He does not have the right equipment, the right information, or anything approaching the right odds. He has a sarcastic remark and an absolute refusal to accept that the situation is as bad as it looks. John McClane is the greatest accidental hero in the history of action cinema — a man whose superpower is stubbornness, whose contingency plan is improvisation, and whose capacity to absorb punishment and keep moving would be alarming if it weren't so useful. He will complain the entire time. He will make it significantly more chaotic than it needed to be. And he will absolutely, unconditionally, without question come through when it counts. Yippee-ki-yay.

Ethan Hunt

Your partner has already run seventeen scenarios by the time you've finished reading the briefing, and the plan he's settled on involves at least two things that should be physically impossible. Ethan Hunt operates at the absolute edge of human capability — technically, physically, and intellectually — and he brings the same relentless precision to protecting his partners that he brings to dismantling organisations that shouldn't exist. He is not easy to know and he will never fully tell you everything. But he will carry the weight of the mission so completely, so absolutely, that your job is simply to trust him — and the remarkable thing is that trusting him always turns out to be the right call. The mission will be impossible. He will complete it anyway.

↻ RETAKE THE QUIZ