Don't let Sigma's premium 35mm overshadow this refreshed classic

Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG II Art | F5.6 | 1/400 sec | IS0 80 Photo: Richard Butler

As the numerals suggest, the Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG II is the company's second-generation 35mm F1.4 for mirrorless cameras. It's also a successor to the 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art: the lens that launched the 'Art' series as part of Sigma's Global Vision rebrand, all the way back in 2012.

At a time when a lot of manufacturers have been focusing on attention-grabbing, often neck-aching and typically wallet-worrying F1.2 lenses, it's refreshing to see an updated 35mm F1.4.

2025 saw Sigma significantly rework its 35mm F1.2, shaving 30% off the weight and a similar amount off its volume, making it a much more practical lens. Now it's done something similar to its (slightly) more modest 35mm F1.4.

The new 35mm F1.4 is 18% lighter than its predecessor (530g / 18.7oz in L-mount form) and both shorter and narrower, helping to reduce the volume by around 20%, too. This size and weight reduction leaves it 30% smaller and 30% lighter than the F1.2, and costing around 30% less. The 1/3EV difference between the two lenses should mean around a 20% reduction in peak light gathering capability.

F1.2 lenses can be excellent: I thoroughly enjoyed using Nikon's 35mm F1.2 when it was launched last year, and I really like the idea that Sigma's version is smaller and lighter, but I've been traveling this last week and have to say that I really appreciate the further size and weight reduction that comes with the move back to F1.4.

It's easy to look at the numbers in isolation and think "225g grams difference, that's something like the weight of four chocolate bars, how could that matter?," but if you have to fit it in your luggage and have it compete for space in a bag you're constantly carrying, the difference makes itself apparent.

The coatings appear to do a good job of maintaining contrast and limiting ghosting

I tried to shoot a selection of images so that you can judge properties such as sharpness, fall-off and bokeh for yourself. To my eye the bokeh looks very, very slightly bright-edged, resulting in a slightly busy appearance in some circumstances, but with a somewhat swirly character that I suspect some people will really like.

I also found the lens to be somewhat prone to flare if used without its (supplied) hood. This just seems to be the result of the large front element catching the light: the coatings appear to do a good job of maintaining contrast and limiting ghosting, even when flare creeps in.

Overall, I rather like the F1.4. 35mm is probably the focal length where, personally, I'd be most tempted to spend the extra to get an F1.2, but carrying the F1.4 around this week has made me appreciate having the option of getting most of the light in something a fair bit lighter.

Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG II Art sample gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing; we do so in good faith, so please don't abuse it.

Thank you to Panasonic for the loan on of a Panasonic Lumix S1RII to capture this gallery. All images were processed using our standard lens workflow in Capture One, with the manufacturer's distortion correction applied but no correction of vignetting. There is extremely minor pincushion distortion before the correction is applied: we do not consider it to be an essential part of the lens design, if you prefer not to use it or your preferred software does not support lens corrections.