6 hours ago
7
The photos you hauled a heavy pack up a mountain to make will almost always feel stronger than the ones you grabbed on a walk to the grocery store. That gap between how an image feels to you and how it reads to everyone else shapes what you print, what goes into a book, and what you show the world.
A sore set of shoulders and a pair of crushed toes turn out to explain a lot about editing. Adrian Vila of aows uses a recent backpacking trip to make the point. On the way up, carrying far too much camera gear left his shoulders aching. On the way down, his boots started crushing his toes, and that new pain was so much worse that he nearly forgot about his shoulders. The trip also took physical training, a permit, and more than three days of driving across the country, so the images from it carry enormous weight for him. Anyone else looking at those frames gets none of that. They weren't on the trail, they don't know about the drive, and they can't feel the relief of reaching the top, which means you have no real way of knowing what a viewer feels when looking at your work.
The standard advice is to wait. Give it months or years, let the emotional charge fade, and eventually the photo starts to stand on its own. Vila agrees that time works but argues there's a quicker route. Only three weeks after the hike, those images already feel like they were made a long time ago, because thousands of new photos have been shot since, some easy and some just as hard-won. Every new frame in your catalog makes the earlier ones feel a little less precious, the same way the toe pain pushed the shoulder pain aside. With 10 images, every one is a treasure. With 100,000 or 200,000, you're unlikely to miss any single one of them.
Psychologists call part of this "effort justification," the tendency to value something more because it cost you more to get. A related finding, nicknamed the IKEA effect, showed that people placed a higher value on furniture they assembled themselves than on identical pieces that came prebuilt. Your photos work the same way, and no amount of willpower switches the bias off. What you can do is build distance into your workflow. Flag images right after a shoot if you like, but hold off on final star ratings until you've imported a few newer sessions, so older frames get judged next to fresh work instead of in isolation. Shrink the grid in Lightroom until every image is a thumbnail, and the ones that rely on a story you remember tend to fall flat while strong compositions still hold up. Showing a photo to someone who wasn't there and asking only what they notice first gives you a rough read on what the image communicates without your memories attached. If you're planning to print, pin a cheap test print somewhere you walk past every day and see whether you still like it after a week.
The effect runs in the other direction too. New work can make you appreciate older images more, especially when a landscape has changed, a subject no longer exists, or you're no longer physically able to get back to a location. Once you know how rare a frame is, its value goes up, and fresh photos are often what reveal which images were weak and which were special from the start. From there, Vila draws a few practical lessons. The first is to be suspicious of your own enthusiasm. The goosebumps you get from a majestic peak or a foggy sunrise are what drive the shooting, and that feeling almost always follows you into the edit, so you need to notice when it does. The second is to slow down before you publish or judge new work, since the photos from last week are the ones you understand least. Vila waits a few days before sharing anything online and suggests waiting months, if not years, before committing new images to prints or a book, with some leeway for long-term projects or refinements of shots you've already made.
Vila's third takeaway is in the video above.
English (US) ·