1 hour ago
5
President Trump declared on Truth Social that the United States doesn’t need new AI regulations because it already has something better: him. In a post dated September 14, 2026, Trump argued that a “STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT” is the only regulatory framework artificial intelligence requires, dismissing growing calls from tech leaders to pump the brakes on development.
The battle lines over AI safety
Trump’s post was a direct response to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who had recently published an essay calling for a measured slowdown in AI development to give safety research time to catch up. That position found support from some notable names, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk, both of whom have called for global coordination on AI safety protocols.
Trump wasn’t buying it. He labeled the push for caution a “SICK conspiracy” and framed it as something that could hand a strategic advantage to China. The closing argument: “WHOEVER WINS AI, WINS!”
A former Anthropic researcher recently departed the company and publicly raised alarms about the potential dangers of self-improving AI technologies. That exit amplified public anxiety about whether the industry is moving too fast, adding fuel to calls for regulatory guardrails.
What the administration is actually doing
Earlier in 2026, the White House implemented a 30-day pre-release voluntary review process for advanced AI models. The emphasis there is on “voluntary.” Companies developing frontier AI systems can submit their models for a national security review before release, but nobody is forcing them to.
The administration also issued a National Security Presidential Memorandum focused on enhancing US cybersecurity as it relates to AI technologies.
This stands in sharp contrast to Europe’s approach, where the EU AI Act has imposed tiered compliance requirements on AI developers. Trump’s administration has explicitly positioned itself against that model, arguing that heavy-handed regulation would cede the AI race to countries less burdened by bureaucratic process.
The innovation-versus-safety tradeoff
Trump’s answer is clear: the market decides, with the president as backstop. Amodei, Altman, and Musk, despite their competitive rivalries, have converged on a different answer: the technology itself may be outrunning any individual’s ability to manage it, regardless of IQ.
China has its own AI regulations, including rules governing generative AI and algorithmic recommendation systems. The idea that safety research is inherently a competitive disadvantage doesn’t hold up to much scrutiny.
What’s worth watching is whether the voluntary review process evolves into something with more teeth, or whether it remains a symbolic gesture. The administration’s bet is that no such incident will materialize before American companies have established an insurmountable lead.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·