1 week ago
9
It's the age-old question: would you rather be rich and miserable, or poor and happy?
These days, the answer feels obvious. With the world teetering on disaster and the cost of living at record highs, who wouldn't pick the money?
With bills going up and daily essentials more expensive than ever, quite frankly, I'm not about to nobly test the merits of poverty, even if it comes with a side of inner satisfaction. Happiness I can figure out later. Right now, I just want to be able to afford petrol.
That little thought experiment was on my mind this week after Jackie 'O' Henderson walked away from her $100million deal to host KIIS FM's The Kyle & Jackie O Show, less than two weeks after a painful verbal incident with co-host Kyle Sandilands.
It's a big deal. A bloody big deal.
The news only broke on Tuesday afternoon. Already there have been a million think pieces about why Jackie threw in the towel - and yet what I keep hearing from behind the curtain in media land is that Jackie's best friend and manager Gemma O'Neill, the gatekeeper to the most expensive woman in radio, is somehow behind it all - or at the very least allowed it to happen.
There may be another reason why Jackie turned her back on Australia's biggest radio show - and eight years of eye‑watering pay cheques - that few observers have thought to mention
And look, I don't claim to be privy to closed-door discussions Gemma and Jackie may have had during her nearly two-week standoff with ARN management, but there's an objective observation to be made here - so I'll state it plainly.
Back in the day, Jackie's affairs were handled by her old manager Brad March, the former CEO of Austereo. I don't know Brad personally, but terms like 'industry veteran' and 'seasoned pro' are often thrown around when his name is mentioned.
When she left his roster and joined forces with Gemma - also a considerable force in the radio business, I should add, having previously served as Head of SCA's Hit Network - anyone could see the shift happening.
In recent years, coinciding with her partnership with Gemma, 50-year-old Jackie has moved away from Sandilands' shock jock style, leaning into a softer, more brand-friendly and female-focused direction.
There were the Besties events, the flowery lifestyle podcast with Gemma (Her Best Life), and the not-at-all subtle pivot into wellness/self-care/empowerment - the sort of messaging that resonates far more with Zimmerman-clad Double Bay mums than tradies on the M4 at 6am chuckling along to 'What's in Jackie's mouth?' on KIIS FM.
As a columnist, it's my job to know what's going on behind the scenes, and the chatter about the most famous duo in Australian radio is loud indeed.
Insiders are saying their diverging paths contributed to the simmering tension that finally exploded on February 20, when Kyle launched his blistering on-air attack over Jackie's interest in astrology - and apparent lack of interest in contributing to Sydney's No. 1 breakfast radio show.
It was messy, it was public, and it was humiliating for Jackie, who has always prided herself on being the 'professional' one. It left the radio industry absolutely stunned.
Gemma O'Neill was seen at Jackie O's home yesterday. Despite the industry chatter, I don't believe for a moment she's to blame for Jackie deciding to walk away from her $100million deal
Everyone was asking the same questions: what the hell is going on?
Then, predictably, came the chatter of 'can't Gemma fix this?' Surely, argued the critics, as the manager of a celebrity client on a $100million contract, she should be doing everything within her power to smooth things over and get Jackie back on air.
The fact that Jackie's contract is now terminated is no doubt being viewed by some as 'she had one job - what went wrong?'
Not everyone in media sees it this way, of course. One source who knows Jackie told me that Gemma would simply have been 'acting on whatever Jac wants to do'.
Which actually makes sense, doesn't it? Isn't that the job of a manager? To support their client's wants and needs, rather than march them into the studio every day even if they are miserable and micromanage every minute of their four-hour shift?
Yet as the theories keep swirling about what made Jackie finally walk away, I don't believe for a second that Gemma nudging her client down the fluffy wellness route and away from mean old Kyle played even the slightest role in her decision.
I'm also not convinced astrology-loving Jackie looked to the stars for answers, as some have playfully speculated.
And while I've previously argued her reinvention at 50 as an eastern suburbs 'It' girl with a fleet of air-kissing friends might have put her at odds with her co-host, I don't believe it was a decisive factor either.
What made her draw a line in the sand? Yes, she was aggrieved by Kyle's outburst on February 20 - that was the main factor, and I don’t suggest otherwise. But in my view, there may be another reason why Jackie turned her back on Australia's biggest radio show - and eight more years of eye‑watering pay cheques - that few observers have thought to mention.
'Most of us would sell our souls for $100million. Jackie doesn't have to. That's what we like to call in media f**k-you money'
Have you guessed it yet? It's surprisingly simple, really.
Yep - it's what we like to call in media 'f**k-you money'.
If you haven't heard the term, here's the gist: FU money means being so wealthy you can walk away from even the most lucrative deals without your lifestyle taking a hit.
Multimillion-dollar contract terminated? No big deal. No job? Who cares.
It means, in other words, that when your colleague treats you appallingly at work, you get to hold your head high, leave the money on the table, and get out of there. That kind of 'f*** you'.
Most of us would sell our souls for $100million.
Jackie doesn't have to. She's crazy rich. Her lifestyle won't change, her Clovelly home, designer wardrobe, six-star holidays - none of that will change.
She'll sleep like a baby tonight, and every night, knowing she never has to worry about affording bills or school fees. She is made for life and should never have to lift a finger again, unless she wants to.
Here's the blunt reality most journalists covering this story haven't considered: Jackie can afford to leave, so she did. It really is as simple as that.
It's us commoners who can't afford to walk away - from anything. One of my girlfriends is trapped in a desk job she hates, tolerating a bullying boss all day, simply because she can't afford to quit. That's the reality of a mortgage and kids.
So by all means, enjoy the media gossip, the he-said-she-said whispers, the anonymous sources, and the snipes at Gemma. But remember this: Jackie walked because she has enough f**k-you money to last several lifetimes. I expect she looked Kyle and her ARN bosses in the eyes and said as much.
And while she has made it clear she's never done anything in this business just for the money, she has earned a lot of it - and that allowed her to take a stand this week.
If only the rest of us had the same freedom.
English (US) ·