Senate Crypto Bill Advances After Lawmakers Strike Stablecoin Reward Agreement

Key Highlights

• Compromise language for the CLARITY Act prohibits stablecoin issuers from distributing yield based purely on passive holdings
• Platforms can continue providing rewards connected to genuine user engagement and network participation
• The agreement between Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks emerged after extensive negotiations
• Coinbase praised the outcome, with CEO Brian Armstrong urging immediate markup proceedings
• Prediction market participants on Polymarket now estimate a 55% probability of 2026 passage, jumping 9 points in one day

---

A contentious disagreement between traditional financial institutions and cryptocurrency companies regarding stablecoin yield programs has reached resolution, removing a significant obstacle from the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act’s legislative path.

Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks unveiled compromise legislative language Friday that explicitly prohibits cryptocurrency platforms from distributing interest or yield to users based solely on stablecoin ownership.

Traditional banking institutions expressed worry that yield-generating stablecoin products would function similarly to deposit accounts, diverting capital from conventional lenders and constraining their lending capacity.

The negotiated framework prevents crypto platforms from offering returns that are “economically or functionally equivalent” to deposit account interest.

Nevertheless, the agreement permits rewards linked to what legislators define as “bona fide activities.” This provision enables platform users to generate returns through active engagement with cryptocurrency platforms and blockchain networks, rather than through passive asset retention.

[[LINK_START_0]]Coinbase[[LINK_END_0]] participated extensively in the negotiation process and faced the greatest business implications. Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad acknowledged that banking interests secured more limitations than crypto advocates preferred, though the fundamental capacity to provide activity-driven rewards remained intact.

[[LINK_START_0]]Coinbase[[LINK_END_0]] CEO Brian Armstrong responded concisely on X: “Mark it up.” Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal emphasized that the framework “preserves activity-based rewards tied to real participation on crypto platforms and networks.”

Operational Implications for Cryptocurrency Platforms

An industry insider indicated that companies must transition from a “buy and hold” approach to a “buy and use” framework to meet the requirements for permissible rewards under the revised regulations.

The legislative text mandates that the Treasury Department and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission initiate rulemaking procedures within twelve months of enactment. These proceedings will establish precise definitions for qualifying activities.

Regulatory agencies will have authority to evaluate elements including account balance, holding duration, and activity characteristics when formulating these guidelines. The text incorporates anti-circumvention provisions as well.

Legislative Calendar and Senate Proceedings

Galaxy Digital head of research Alex Thorn indicated that publication of the compromise text signals the Senate Banking Committee may schedule markup proceedings “as soon as the week of May 11.”

Thorn cautioned that banking sector opposition efforts are anticipated to intensify following disclosure of the finalized legislative language.

Senator Bernie Moreno recently projected the legislation would reach completion by late May. Senator Cynthia Lummis declared on April 11, “It’s now or never.”

The Clarity Act encountered delays earlier this year when a scheduled January markup was abruptly postponed.

Polymarket prediction market participants currently assess a 55% likelihood that the CLARITY Act receives presidential approval in 2026.

President Donald Trump has elevated cryptocurrency regulatory reform among his second-term priorities. Cryptocurrency enterprises have historically functioned within ambiguous regulatory frameworks, which industry leaders contend has restricted business expansion opportunities.