3 hours ago
18
In her new book, “Hollywood Whispers: The Untold Story of the Original Gossip Queens, Louella Parsons and Hedda Hopper,” Eileen Cope delves into a rivalry that dramatically shaped the entertainment industry and culture at large throughout the mid-20th century. After the birth of the star system in Hollywood, Parsons and Hopper rose to prominence as gossip columnists who could make and break careers, and choose to keep or expose celebrities’ secrets. With a combined readership of 75 million at their peak, Hopper and Parsons wielded extraordinary influence — and instilled paralyzing fear. As columnist Liz Smith has written, “The studios created both of them. And they thought they could control both of them. But they became Frankenstein monsters escaped from the labs.” In the excerpt below, Cope summarizes their stark differences — and even more striking similarities.
Hollywood has always been a hall of mirrors. What began as an industry of light and illusion had, by the 1940s, become a machinery of control—an empire built on fantasy, running on fear. Its dreammakers no longer needed scripts or cameras to keep order. They had Louella Parsons and Hedda Hopper.
By then, both women had transcended the ordinary limits of journalism. They were not simply reporters; they were gatekeepers of belief, the quiet regulators of a nation’s imagination. To cross them was to risk vanishing—not merely from the screen, but from the collective story America told about itself.
Hollywood insiders referred to them—half jokingly, half in dread—as “the High Priestesses.” Studio secretaries clipped their columns before the morning dailies reached the lot, marking any mention of the studio’s stars with red pencil. Publicists phoned assistants in panic if a name appeared in the wrong context. “They could wreck you before lunch,” remembered producer Pandro Berman. “And by dinner, they’d make you again—if it suited them.”
It was easy, at first, to mistake their power for personality. Louella, with her sanctimonious charm and the backing of William Randolph Hearst, ruled the studios from her desk at the Los Angeles Examiner. Her typewriter was a throne. Her column ran like clockwork through America’s breakfast tables, a sermon of what was right and who had sinned. Hedda, the actress-turned-crusader, cultivated a different tone—brassy, righteous, vengeful. Her voice carried across radio waves like a call to arms. She didn’t just write gossip; she announced it, her cadence turning every name into an accusation or an absolution.
Both women understood theater. Louella played the role of moral mother, her column written in the soothing cadences of propriety—rarely venomous on the surface, yet devastating in its implications. Hedda was the showwoman. “When she walked into Ciro’s,” recalled gossip photographer Frank Worth, “it was like someone had switched on the lights.” Even those who loathed her found themselves glancing up, afraid she might be looking at them.
Louella and Hedda were two sides of the same coin, minted in a culture that worshipped celebrity and feared moral chaos. Each understood what the studios feared most: scandal, exposure, the sudden rupture of the illusion. And they learned to trade in that fear, turning rumor into regulation.
Louella had built her empire first. By the early 1930s, her column appeared in hundreds of newspapers through the Hearst syndicate, reaching an estimated twenty million readers daily. Hollywood Hotel, her weekly radio show, brought the glamour of opening nights directly into American living rooms. Its mix of studio orchestras, star appearances, and previews of upcoming films created a powerful cycle of cross-promotion: her print column drove listeners to the broadcast, and the broadcast reinforced her authority in print.
She was feared as much as courted. Stars who crossed her found themselves frozen out. Studio executives who annoyed her might find their films receiving tepid coverage. A single line hinting that an actor appeared “unhappy with recent assignments” could trigger studio meetings and contract reviews. Louella’s prose was brief, polite, and devastatingly coded; her readers learned to interpret her tone as carefully as her text. The fear she inspired was not only of what she printed but of what she might choose not to.
The competition she could not have predicted came in the form of a woman she had once treated as a harmless curiosity. By 1935, Hedda Hopper’s film career was essentially over. She was fifty, though she claimed forty-five, watching her savings evaporate and terrified about her future. When a studio executive suggested she could “transition to extra work,” Hedda turned the humiliation into fuel. If she couldn’t star in movies, she would make herself the story. The weapon she would wield was not beauty or youth, but the pen.
When a friend suggested she try writing a gossip column, Hedda was insulted. Writing gossip seemed like a public acknowledgment that she couldn’t make it as a performer. But desperation has a way of making humiliation seem acceptable. She borrowed a typewriter, set up at her kitchen table, and began by writing what she knew best: the petty rivalries of actors who had underestimated her. “I never lied,” she said later, “but I didn’t always tell the truth either.” The early columns were messy but alive, full of energy and vengeance.
Then Hedda got angry. She stopped trying to write like a journalist and started writing like herself— sharp, critical, unsparing, willing to say things other columnists wouldn’t dare print. Twenty years as a working actress had also given her something valuable: relationships with the people Louella ignored. Character actors, crew members, hairdressers, chauffeurs, and wardrobe girls had no loyalty to Louella, and many were happy to talk to Hedda, who had once been one of them.
The Los Angeles Times noticed. Hearst’s primary competitor in Southern California saw Hedda as a weapon against his dominance through Louella. In 1938, the paper offered Hedda a contract with better pay, more resources, and a much larger platform. She would compete directly with the woman who had been Hollywood’s undisputed gossip queen for fifteen years.
Most people thought she would be crushed. Instead, Hedda transformed herself for the opportunity. She began wearing the enormous hats that became her trademark—creations decorated with feathers, flowers, fruit, and even stuffed animals. The hats ensured that everyone at a Hollywood event knew when Hedda Hopper had arrived. She also developed a confrontational style that contrasted with Louella’s cozy approach. Where Louella praised, Hedda criticized. Where Louella protected relationships, Hedda burned bridges. Where Louella sought to be loved, Hedda was content to be feared.
In the beginning, the difference between them seemed simple enough. Louella had the empire; Hedda had the instinct. Louella’s authority came from her link to Hearst—a patriarchal structure she both served and mastered. Hedda’s came from sheer velocity. She moved fast, wrote fast, spoke fast. She had learned that outrage was more contagious than affection.
At first, the two women coexisted uneasily, even politely. Louella sent Hedda a congratulatory telegram when her first radio broadcast went national. Hedda responded with a bouquet of orchids and a note that read, “To the Queen of the Kingdom I am only visiting.” But the civility evaporated as soon as Hedda’s column began pulling readers away from the Examiner. In 1940, when Hedda’s column syndication reached more than six million households, Louella persuaded Hearst’s editors to bar her rival from every Hearst-owned paper.
As the 1940s unfolded, their feud became public theater. Columns answered columns. Louella hinted that Hedda was “overly dramatic.” Hedda fired back, calling Louella “a relic of studio servitude.” Studios courted both women, sometimes feeding them different versions of the same story to see who would publish first. Readers began to choose sides.
In 1945, Photoplay published “Battle of the Typewriters,” complete with caricatures of the two women as dueling queens—Louella seated on a gilt throne, Hedda brandishing her hatpins like weapons. The story outsold every issue that year except the one featuring Clark Gable’s return from the war. The public couldn’t get enough. For a nation recovering from global conflict, the spectacle of two powerful women waging a cold war of words was irresistible.
Their methods echo through the media that followed. The tabloid boom of the 1980s, TMZ, Instagram, celebrity influencers, blind-item accounts, and the daily social-media outrage cycle all trace their lineage to the template Louella and Hedda built. They understood that access could be traded, intimacy manufactured, morality weaponized, and a public image constructed or destroyed through repetition. The machine they built continues to hum behind every red carpet and every scandal recycled for entertainment. What they truly enshrined was attention—and America never stopped worshiping it.
The women themselves could not stop Hollywood from moving on. As the studio system declined and stars emerged, the two gossip queens became relics of the world they had once governed. When the Los Angeles Examiner folded in 1962, Louella suffered a professional blow. Already showing signs of physical deterioration, she nevertheless continued going out, bejeweled and bewildered, like a dowager empress whose country had overthrown her rule. She finally retired in 1965, beset by further medical problems.
Hedda had always advised leaving a party before the glow faded. On February 1, 1966, she died in Los Angeles of double pneumonia at the age of eighty. Her cryptic parting words were entirely in character: “They should know what I haven’t written!”
Louella’s daughter, Harriet, visited her mother at the Santa Monica nursing home to deliver the news that Hedda Hopper was dead. Louella sat in profound silence, then appeared confused. She would live for another six years, largely withdrawn from the world she had once ruled, before dying of arteriosclerosis on December 9, 1972, at the age of ninety-one. But on hearing that her great rival had finally departed, Louella gathered herself long enough to offer one last, unmistakable verdict: “GOOD!”
Adapted from “Hollywood Whispers: The Untold Story of the Original Gossip Queens, Louella Parsons and Hedda Hopper” available November 3 from Lyons Press.
English (US) ·