A Classic Bond Girl Is Officially Returning for a New Release

1 hour ago 16

Published Oct 28, 2026, 10:00 PM EDT

A cinematic obsessive with the filmic palate of a starving raccoon, Rob London will watch pretty much anything once. With a mind like a steel trap, he's an endless fount of movie and TV trivia, borne from a misspent youth of watching monster movies on TV, perusing the sun-faded goods at the local video rental shop, and staining his fingers with ink from the Video Movie Guide. Areas of interest include science fiction, film noir, horror flicks, '70s disaster pictures, Bond movies, '90s action, giant robots, dinosaurs, super heroes, and the exuberantly schlocky output of Cannon Films. He also enjoys both Star Trek and Star Wars when they're good, and maybe even more when they're bad. As a Canadian, he also has a vested interest in Canadian movies and TV shows, especially the cheesier ones dubbed "Canuxploitation."

An expert on Marvel Comics, he has also written for the Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe, and is a member of the Marvel Research Team. He can frequently be found pontificating on comic-book continuity or bemoaning the misfortunes of the Toronto Maple Leafs on his Twitter account.

James Bond fans everywhere are waiting on tenterhooks for the new Bond bosses at Amazon MGM Studios to select the new 007. Even after they find the right man to be licensed to kill, the next Bond movie, which will be directed by Denis Villeneuve, is still years away. However, there's a new Bond story on the way in the medium that first gave rise to the iconic secret agent, with one of his classic love interests in tow.

Ian Fleming, who created James Bond in 1952's Casino Royale, died in 1964, having penned twelve Bond novels and two short story collections. Since then, a number of successors have taken up his role as Bond's literary chronicler; the first was Kingsley Amis, under the pseudonym Robert Markham, who penned Colonel Sun in 1968. New Bond novels are published to this day, with a new novella due this winter from novelist and historian Dan Jones.

All In, a new novella by Jones, is set in the Southeast Asian island nation of Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) in 1954. The British are leaving the newly independent Ceylon, but not Bond, who's on the trail of a precious gemstone. And he won't be alone; aiding him is the beautiful diamond smuggler Tiffany Case. Case was created by Fleming in Diamonds are Forever; All In commemorates the 70th anniversary of its 1956 publication. It will hit store shelves on December 3.

Collider Exclusive · James Bond Personality Quiz Which James Bond Actor Are You Most Like? Connery · Moore · Dalton · Brosnan · Lazenby · Craig

Six actors. Six completely different visions of the same man — dangerous, charming, complicated, and almost certainly wearing a very good suit. Only one of them shares your particular way of moving through the world. Eight questions will figure out which Bond you really are.

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿Connery

😄Moore

🎭Dalton

✨Brosnan

🤵Lazenby

💠Craig

FIND YOUR BOND →

How do you carry yourself when you walk into a room? Bond is always the most interesting person in the room. The question is how he makes you feel it.

AWith absolute authority — I don't announce myself. I simply make everyone aware that I've arrived. BWith a raised eyebrow and a ready quip — I'd rather disarm a room than dominate it. CWith focused intensity — I'm taking everything in, and people can tell. DWith polish and ease — I look like I belong everywhere, because I've decided I do. EWith quiet confidence — I'm still figuring out my place, but I carry myself as if I already know it. FWith guarded stillness — I notice everything and give nothing away until I choose to.

NEXT QUESTION →

How do you handle a dangerous situation? Every Bond faces it differently. What does your version look like?

AWith dangerous calm — I've been here before, and the threat already knows it's made a mistake. BWith improvisation and a degree of theatrical flair — tension should never be wasted. CHead-on and without hesitation — I don't need gadgets. I have training, and I use it. DWith the right tool for the job — I came prepared, and preparation is its own form of confidence. EInstinctively — I react faster than I think, and it usually works out. FWith controlled brutality — I don't enjoy it, but I don't flinch from what the moment requires.

NEXT QUESTION →

How do you charm someone you need on your side? Bond always gets what he needs. The method varies considerably.

AI make them feel like the most interesting person in the room — for exactly as long as I need them to be. BI make them laugh — a shared laugh is the fastest way to make someone trust you. CI'm direct and honest — I tell them what I need and why. Manipulation wastes time. DWith surface perfection — the right words, the right smile, deployed with enough precision to look effortless. EBy being present and genuine — I'm still developing my technique, but sincerity covers a lot of ground. FReluctantly and sparingly — I'd rather earn trust through actions than manufacture it through charm.

NEXT QUESTION →

How do you handle your emotions on the job? Every Bond deals with this differently. Most of them not particularly well.

AI suppress them completely — detachment is a professional requirement, not a personal failing. BI deflect with humour — a well-timed joke is the best defence against genuine feeling. CI let them show — I'm not ashamed of feeling things, and I think pretending not to is its own kind of weakness. DI compartmentalise with precision — everything in its place, nothing bleeding into the mission. EWith difficulty — I haven't quite worked out the system yet, and sometimes it shows. FBy burying them — deeply, imperfectly, in ways that eventually cost me something important.

NEXT QUESTION →

How would your colleagues describe your working style? MI6 has opinions about all of its 00s. What are theirs about you?

AEffective and uncompromising — results-focused to the point where the methods occasionally become a concern. BReliably brilliant in the field, occasionally exasperating in the briefing room. CPrincipled to a fault — they'd rather do it right than do it fast, and they'll tell you so. DPolished, capable, and slightly too good at making it look easy. ERaw potential — still developing, but there's something there that's hard to teach. FA weapon. Pointed at problems, usually effective, occasionally unpredictable.

NEXT QUESTION →

How do you feel about operating within the rules? The licence to kill comes with terms and conditions. Not everyone reads them.

ARules are for people who haven't earned the judgement to know when to break them. BI follow them in spirit and bend them in practice — the important thing is the outcome. CI take them seriously — there are things I won't do regardless of what the mission requires. DI work within them effectively and creatively — the system has its uses if you know how to navigate it. EI'm still working out where my lines are — the job has a way of moving them on you. FI follow orders until I decide the order is wrong. Then I act on my own judgement and accept the consequences.

NEXT QUESTION →

What is your relationship with love? Every Bond has a different answer. None of them have found it easy.

AA liability I've learned to manage — I don't let it interfere with the work, and I try not to examine why. BA pleasure I take seriously in the moment, lightly in the long term, and honestly in between. CSomething I want genuinely — and struggle to reconcile with the life I've chosen. DPart of the performance — I'm charming, and I enjoy it, but I keep the door to anything deeper firmly closed. ESomething that surprised me — I found it when I wasn't looking and it changed everything, briefly. FA wound I carry — something happened, and I haven't fully processed what it means for everything since.

NEXT QUESTION →

When the mission is over, how do you want to be remembered? The name is Bond. The rest is entirely up to the man behind it.

AAs the original — the one who defined what this could be before anyone else knew what it was. BAs someone who made it enjoyable — who understood that entertainment is its own kind of excellence. CAs someone who took it seriously — who refused to coast and pushed harder than the role required. DAs the complete package — who had the looks, the timing, and the ability to make it all seem inevitable. EAs an underrated chapter — one that deserved more time and more credit than it received. FAs the one who made it human — who found the cost beneath the cool and didn't look away from it.

REVEAL MY BOND →

The Name Has Been Determined Your Bond Is…

Six actors. One role. Your answers point to the Bond who shares your presence, your method, and your particular way of carrying the weight of being the most dangerous person in the room.

Sean Connery

You are the original — and you carry that fact without needing to announce it. There is an authority in the way you occupy a room that others spend careers trying to replicate.

You don't explain yourself, justify yourself, or soften yourself for anyone's comfort. The confidence is structural, not performed.
Connery's Bond established everything — the tone, the danger, the cool — because Connery himself had the innate presence to make something that had never existed feel inevitable.
You share that quality: the sense that you were always going to end up exactly here, doing exactly this.
The name is Bond. In your case, it always was.

Roger Moore

You understand something that more serious people miss: that wit is its own form of intelligence, and that making people laugh is not a retreat from danger but a way of mastering it.

Moore's Bond is underrated precisely because the effortlessness looks easy — and effortlessness is the hardest thing to manufacture.
You have the same quality: a lightness that disarms people before they realise how sharp you actually are.
The raised eyebrow, the perfectly timed quip, the refusal to be rattled — these are not affectations. They are a philosophy about how to move through a world that would like to take itself too seriously.
You have never let it.

Timothy Dalton

You took the role seriously when everyone wanted you to coast — and that refusal to take the easy version of anything is the most defining thing about you.

Dalton's Bond has genuine moral weight: he feels the cost of what he does, he has lines he won't cross, and he is not interested in the version of himself that pretends otherwise.
You share that intensity. You push harder than the situation technically requires, because you have a standard and you hold yourself to it.
He was ahead of his time — the Bond the franchise wasn't quite ready for yet, arriving exactly when he was meant to.
You know what that feels like.

Pierce Brosnan

You are the complete package — and you know it, which is part of what makes you so effective and occasionally so infuriating to the people around you.

Brosnan arrived at the role looking exactly like Bond was supposed to look, and he delivered on that expectation with a professionalism that made it seem effortless.
You have the same quality: a smooth competence, a charm that operates like a precision instrument, and the ability to make even difficult things look like they weren't.
His era was the most commercially successful in the franchise's history. There is a reason for that.
The reason is that some people simply fit their moment perfectly. You are one of those people.

George Lazenby

You stepped into something enormous with less preparation than anyone around you thought was sufficient — and you delivered something genuine anyway, which is the more impressive achievement.

Lazenby's single outing is, by many measures, one of the finest Bond films ever made — and he is not a small part of why.
You share his quality of raw authenticity: less polished than the alternatives, more honest for it, capable of something real that technique alone can't produce.
He was underestimated, and then he wasn't, and then history caught up with him.
You are the kind of person history catches up with. Give it time.

Daniel Craig

You stripped everything back and found what was underneath — and what was underneath was harder, more honest, and more human than anyone expected.

Craig's Bond is the franchise's most psychologically complete: a man doing a brutal job, carrying its costs imperfectly, capable of love and loss in ways that can't be dismissed.
You share that depth. You don't hide behind the role or the charm or the suit — you let the work show what it actually costs.
He was controversial from the moment he was announced and definitive by the time he was finished. The sceptics became the believers.
That arc — of being underestimated and then undeniable — is one you know intimately.

↻ RETAKE THE QUIZ

What Is 'Diamonds Are Forever' About?

The novel Diamonds Are Forever pits Bond and reluctantly ally Case against the Spangled Mob, an organized crime syndicate who are smuggling valuable diamonds and killing everyone involved in the scheme to cover their tracks. In the 1971 film, the diamond smuggling scheme is being masterminded by Ernst Stavro Blofeld (Charles Gray) and SPECTRE, with a Space Age twist; the diamonds are being used to power an orbital space laser that Blofeld intends to blackmail the world with. Bond (Sean Connery, returning to the role after being replaced by George Lazenby for On Her Majesty's Secret Service) and Case (Jill St. John) have to stay one step ahead of Blofeld's eccentric assassins, Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd (Bruce Glover and Putter Smith) while investigating his connection to reclusive millionaire Willard Whyte (Jimmy Dean).

All In will be released on December 3. Stay tuned to Collider for future updates.