Image via Showcase
Updated Oct 25, 2026, 3:41 PM EDT
Amanda M. Castro is a Network TV writer at Collider and a New York–based journalist whose work has appeared in Newsweek, where she is an Associate Editor, and The U.S. Sun, where she previously served as a Senior Consumer Reporter.
She specializes in network television coverage, delivering sharp, thoughtful analysis of long-running procedural hits and ambitious new dramas across broadcast TV. At Collider, Amanda explores character arcs, storytelling trends, and the cultural impact of network series that keep audiences tuning in week after week.
Born and raised in Puerto Rico, Amanda is bilingual and holds a degree in Communication, Film, and Media Studies from the University of New Haven.
Sign in to your Collider account
When Travelers made its debut on Netflix in 2016, it slid in beneath the radar next to powerhouses such as Stranger Things and The OA. However, three thrilling seasons later, the Canadian time travel thriller wrapped itself around an adoring fanbase that now praises it as one of the few emotionally intelligent and perfectly done sci-fi series of the 2010s.
Created by Stargate veteran Brad Wright, Travelers follows a team of operatives sent back from a post-apocalyptic future — not in physical form, but as consciousnesses implanted into people moments before their deaths. Led by FBI agent Grant MacLaren (Eric McCormack), each traveler must live the life of their host while secretly carrying out missions assigned by “the Director,” an AI that monitors the timeline from the future.
While it is a premise that could have easily gotten out of hand and become unmanageable, Travelers took a high-concept sci-fi show and made it about character first. Every mission, mission protocol, and moral dilemma spread outward from one haunting question: How much of yourself can you give up to save the future?
'Travelers' Stands Out in a Crowded Genre
On paper, Travelers could have been a procedural with a time-travel twist. In practice, it was something much richer — a show where science fiction served humanity, not the other way around. Each episode balanced the team’s covert operations with the everyday struggles of maintaining their hosts’ lives: A medic posing as a woman with brain damage, a historian inhabiting a heroin addict, a tactician raising a child as a single mother.
Through those lives, the series examined morality, grief, and identity with a restraint rarely seen in genre television. These characters didn’t just “fix” the past; they inhabited it, built relationships, and endured its consequences. Even as the show dealt with quantum computers, competing future factions, and paradoxes of fate, it always returned to the personal cost of playing God.
The performances helped ground the wild premise. McCormack shed his Will & Grace charm to deliver a quietly tortured portrayal of leadership and guilt. MacKenzie Porter, Nesta Cooper, Jared Abrahamson, and Reilly Dolman rounded out the ensemble with performances that made their impossible circumstances feel painfully real. Fans on Reddit still call Travelers “criminally underrated,” praising its “brilliant concept” and “perfect ending.” The series even holds a 100% Rotten Tomatoes score.
'Travelers' Deserves to be Revisited
Image via NetflixRewatching Travelers today, the show feels even more relevant. Its depiction of people using technology to rewrite their mistakes—guided by an algorithmic “Director”—hits differently in an age obsessed with AI ethics and digital control. The Director may be fictional, but the questions it raises about autonomy, surveillance, and sacrifice feel uncomfortably real.
At its core, Travelers serves as a warning wrapped in entertainment. The future agents are from is barren. There are no resources, the oceans are poisoned, and even small pleasures like tea or carrots are no longer enjoyed. They are not performing heroic tasks for decoration, but rather preserving and saving as much as they can. Each time a traveler bends the rules or takes a chance not to be detected, the show reminds us how easy it is to go from something progressive to something destructive.
Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Survival Quiz Which Sci-Fi World Would You Survive? The Matrix · Mad Max · Blade Runner · Dune · Star Wars
Five universes. Five completely different ways the future went wrong — or sideways, or up in flames. Only one of them is the world your instincts were built for. Eight questions will figure out which dystopia, galaxy, or desert wasteland you'd actually make it out of alive.
💊The Matrix
🔥Mad Max
🌧️Blade Runner
🏜️Dune
🚀Star Wars
TEST YOUR SURVIVAL →
01
You sense something is deeply wrong with the world around you. What do you do? The first instinct is often the truest one.
APull on every thread until I understand the system — then figure out how to break it. BStop asking questions and start stockpiling — food, fuel, weapons. Questions don't keep you alive. CKeep my head down, observe carefully, and trust no one until I know who's pulling the strings. DStudy the patterns. Every system has a rhythm — learn it, and you learn how to survive it. EFind the people fighting back and join them. You can't fix a broken galaxy alone.
NEXT QUESTION →
02
In a world of scarcity, what resource do you guard most fiercely? What we protect reveals what we believe survival actually requires.
AKnowledge. If you understand the system, you don't need resources — you can generate them. BFuel. Everything else — movement, power, escape — runs on it. CTrust. In a world of fakes and informants, a truly reliable ally is rarer than any commodity. DWater. And after water, information — the two things empires are truly built on. EShips and credits. The galaxy is big — you survive it by being able to move through it freely.
NEXT QUESTION →
03
What kind of threat keeps you up at night? Fear is useful data — if you're honest about what you're actually afraid of.
AThat reality itself is a lie — that everything I experience has been constructed to keep me compliant. BA raid. No warning, no mercy — just the roar of engines and then nothing left. CBeing identified. Once someone with power decides you're a problem, you're already out of time. DBeing outmanoeuvred — losing a political game I didn't even know I was playing. EThe Empire tightening its grip until there's nowhere left to run.
NEXT QUESTION →
04
How do you deal with authority you don't trust? Every dystopia has a power structure. Your approach to it determines everything.
ASubvert it from the inside — learn its rules well enough to weaponise them against it. BIgnore it and stay out of its reach. The further from any power structure, the better. CAppear to comply while doing exactly what I need to do. Visibility is the enemy. DManoeuvre within it carefully. You can't beat a system you refuse to understand. EResist openly when I have to. Some things are worth the risk of being seen.
NEXT QUESTION →
05
Which environment could you actually endure long-term? Survival isn't just tactical — it's physical, psychological, and very much about where you are.
AUnderground bunkers and server rooms — cramped, artificial, but with access to everything that matters. BOpen wasteland — brutal sun, no shelter, constant movement. At least the threat is honest. CA dense, rain-soaked city where you can disappear into the crowd and nobody asks questions. DMerciless desert — extreme heat, no water, and something enormous living beneath the sand. EThe fringe — backwater planets and busy spaceports where the Empire's attention rarely reaches.
NEXT QUESTION →
06
Who do you want in your corner when things fall apart? The company you keep is the clearest signal of who you actually are.
AA tight crew of believers who've seen behind the curtain and have nothing left to lose. BOne or two people I'd trust with my life. Any more than that and someone talks. CNobody, ideally. Alliances are liabilities. I work alone unless I have no choice. DA community bound by shared hardship and mutual survival — people who need each other to last. EA ragtag team with wildly different skills and total commitment when it counts.
NEXT QUESTION →
07
Where do you draw the line — if you draw one at all? Every survivor eventually faces a moment that tests what they're actually made of.
AI won't harm the innocent — even the ones who'd report me without hesitation. BI do what I have to to protect the people I've chosen. Everything else is negotiable. CThe line shifts depending on who's asking and what's at stake. DI draw a long-term line — nothing that compromises my people's future, even if it'd help now. ESome lines, once crossed, can't be uncrossed. I know which ones they are.
NEXT QUESTION →
08
What would actually make survival worth it? Staying alive is one thing. Having a reason to is another.
AWaking others up — dismantling the illusion so no one else has to live inside it. BFinding somewhere — or someone — worth protecting. A reason to keep moving. CAnswers. Understanding what I am, what any of this means, before time runs out. DLegacy — shaping the future in a way that outlasts me by generations. EFreedom — for myself, for others, for every world still living under someone else's boot.
REVEAL MY WORLD →
Your Fate Has Been Calculated You'd Survive In…
Your answers point to the world your instincts were built for. This is the universe your temperament, your survival instincts, and your particular brand of stubbornness were made for.
The Matrix
You took the red pill a long time ago — probably before anyone offered it to you. You're a systems thinker who can't help but notice the seams in things.
- You're drawn to understanding how the system works before figuring out how to break it.
- You'd find the Resistance, or it would find you — your instinct for spotting constructed realities is the machines' worst nightmare.
- You function best when you have access to information and the freedom to act on it.
- The Matrix built an airtight prison. You'd be the one probing the walls for the door.
Mad Max
The wasteland doesn't reward the clever or the well-connected — it rewards those who are hard to kill and harder to break. That's you.
- You don't need comfort, community, or a cause larger than the next horizon.
- You need a vehicle, a clear threat, and enough fuel to outrun it — and you're good at all three.
- You are unsentimental enough to survive that world, and decent enough — just barely — to be something more than another raider.
- In the wasteland, that distinction is everything.
Blade Runner
You'd survive here because you know how to exist in moral grey areas without losing yourself completely.
- You read people accurately, keep your circle small, and ask the questions others prefer not to answer.
- In a city where humanity is a legal designation rather than a feeling, you hold onto something that keeps you functional.
- You're not a hero. But you're not lost, either.
- In Blade Runner's world, that distinction is everything.
Dune
Arrakis is the most hostile environment in the known universe — and you are precisely the kind of person it rewards.
- Patience, discipline, and political awareness are your core strengths — and on Arrakis, they're survival tools.
- You understand that the long game matters more than any single victory.
- Others come to Dune and are consumed by it. You'd learn its logic and earn its respect.
- In time, you wouldn't just survive Arrakis — you'd begin to reshape it.
Star Wars
The galaxy far, far away is vast, loud, and in a constant state of violent political upheaval — and you wouldn't have it any other way.
- You find meaning in being part of something larger than yourself — a cause, a crew, a rebellion.
- You'd gravitate toward the Rebellion, or the fringes, or whatever pocket of the galaxy still believes the Empire's grip can be broken.
- You fight — not because you have to, but because standing aside isn't something you're capable of.
- In Star Wars, that willingness is what makes all the difference.
↻ RETAKE THE QUIZ
That human core is what makes Travelers endure. Beneath the countdown timers and clandestine briefings, the series was always about connection—about people trying to hold on to love and loyalty in a life that isn’t entirely theirs. Even the show’s rules, the famous six “Protocols,” weren’t just sci-fi window dressing; they were moral boundaries meant to test the characters’ humanity.
'Travelers' Cancellation Still Stings 7 Years Later
Image via NetflixIt was understandable when Netflix canceled Travelers after Season 3 in 2019 that the fans who loved the show were heartbroken. But, as McCormack said at the time, "Program 1 is finished." The finale brought the show to a close with remarkable completeness to the travelers' story arc and implied that there are endless iterations of mission resets and resets. It was an ending that seemed earned as opposed to an ambiguous cliffhanger. In a time when so many sci-fi series take off and land messily, Travelers took the incredible feat of landing well.
Looking back at Travelers in 2025, it’s hard not to see its resonance with modern anxieties about climate, technology, and human connection. It’s a show of responsibility — the idea that our decisions today matter and influence the decisions everyone else can make in the future, and it ultimately conveys that idea through tight storytelling, sharp writing, and a team you really want to succeed. So, if you find yourself scrolling through Netflix tonight and unsure of what to watch, spend some time visiting one of the best-kept sci-fi secrets of the 21st century.
English (US) ·