Romantic movies get forgotten for reasons that honestly make me a little bitter. There are films like The Notebook, A Walk to Remember, etc. that almost everybody watches religiously growing up. Then there is this whole other shelf of romance, stranger, softer, funnier, bruisier, more intimate, where movies understood longing in very human ways and somehow still slipped out of the conversation. Not because they failed. Because romance is one of the first genres people condescend to when memory gets lazy.
That is a shame. But no more. I’m bringing up all the movies that mattered now. The 10 films in this list know chemistry is not enough. Timing matters. Class matters. Grief matters. Baggage matters. Shyness matters. The version of yourself you become around one person versus another person matters. All of them deserve better than being treated like secret treasures when they should just be treasures.
10 'Only You' (1994)
Image Via TriStar PicturesWhat I love about Only You is how recklessly it believes in romantic destiny without becoming stupid about it. Faith in “the one” can get unbearable fast in movies if it is written as some smug cosmic guarantee. Here it works because Faith Corvatch (Marisa Tomei) does not come off like a manic fantasy machine. When she hears the name Damon Bradley and bolts toward Italy, the movie understands that what looks absurd from the outside can feel emotionally necessary from the inside. That is the whole charm.
And then the film gives you Peter Wright (Robert Downey Jr.) at exactly the right frequency, mischievous, improvisational, a little dangerous in that charming way people in romantic films used to be allowed to be. The Italian setting helps, obviously, but not because it is postcard-pretty. It helps because the movie knows travel can loosen a person’s grip on their old self. Only You is really about what happens when fantasy collides with a living, breathing, inconvenient person and turns out to be better because it is messier. That is real romantic intelligence. It is not mocking idealism. It is testing whether idealism can survive contact with chemistry.
9 'Return to Me' (2000)
Image via MGM Distribution Co.This movie could have been unbearable. That premise, widower unknowingly falls for the woman who received his late wife’s heart, could have gone wrong in about seventeen manipulative ways. But Return to Me works because it never treats the concept like a cheap twist. It treats it like an emotional problem that human beings are trying, with great difficulty, not to mishandle. Bob Rueland (David Duchovny) is not just sad in a polished rom-com way. He is genuinely hollowed out, moving through life like the shape of routine remained after the feeling got burned away. Grace Briggs (Minnie Driver), meanwhile, has this warmth and fragility that the movie is wise enough not to oversell.
What makes the film special is its decency. Not softness. Decency. It understands that both people are carrying something sacred and awkward and potentially disastrous into the relationship, and it lets the sweetness of their connection grow before the premise’s moral complication fully crashes down on them. The supporting ensemble helps too. In a nutshell — Return to Me is romantic because it believes love can arrive through grief without disrespecting grief, and that is a very hard balance to strike.
8 'Untamed Heart' (1993)
Image via Metro-Goldwyn-MayerI have a real weakness for movies like this, films that are almost too vulnerable for their own good. Untamed Heart is not sophisticated in the cool, lacquered sense. It is emotionally naked. Adam (Christian Slater) is shy, wounded, inward, the kind of romantic figure modern movies are often too embarrassed to take seriously because sincerity now gets treated like something that needs defense mechanisms around it.
Caroline (Marisa Tomei) has more noise in her life, more chaos, more visible confusion, and the movie is smart enough to understand what would make these two people pull toward each other. Not just attraction. Recognition. The feeling of meeting someone whose loneliness rhymes with yours in a different key. And yes, the movie has that famous romantic-symbolism angle that some people find too much. I do not care. It works because the film’s emotional world is already pitched toward fable. What matters is that Untamed Heart knows love sometimes enters through protectiveness, through quietness, through being looked at by somebody who does not seem to want to consume you or perform around you. Tenderness feels erotic in this film and real ones know that hits different on a low-dopamine day.
7 'One Fine Day' (1996)
Image via 20th Century StudiosOne Fine Day is two stressed single parents having a chaotic day in New York and falling for each other, and sure, that is the skeleton. But the reason it works is that Melanie Parker (Michelle Pfeiffer) and Jack Taylor (George Clooney) understand speed. They understand how adults under pressure flirt while pretending they do not have time to flirt. The movie is built on scheduling panic, childcare panic, work panic, urban panic, and that is exactly why the romantic current feels so satisfying. It has to sneak in through irritation.
And that grown-up quality is what makes the film more than just a pleasant studio romance. These people are not drifting around waiting for a meet-cute to reorganize their souls. They are busy, frustrated, overextended, carrying the low-level fatigue of people whose lives are already spoken for. So when chemistry starts happening, it feels earned in a very adult way. It feels like relief mixed with surprise. And New York helps enormously, as a city where timing, inconvenience, and momentum constantly shove people into each other’s orbit. One Fine Day gets the texture of that kind of accidental intimacy exactly right.
6 'Crossing Delancey' (1988)
Image via Warner Bros.This is one of the greatest romantic films about a woman mistaking self-image for self-knowledge. Crossing Delancey follows Isabelle Grossman (Amy Irving) who is smart, cultured, ambitious, a little vain in the totally human sense, and deeply attached to the version of herself that belongs to one social world rather than another. That is what makes the movie so good. It is not just “career woman learns to appreciate nice guys.” It is about class taste, embarrassment, intellectual vanity, Jewish family expectation, urban loneliness, and the way romance often reveals where a person’s self-myth has started working against them.
And Sam (Peter Riegert) is such a wonderful romantic hero because the movie never turns his steadiness into blandness. Riegert gives him this dry, grounded, slightly wounded presence that makes him feel like a man who has already done the work of becoming a whole person and is now standing in front of someone still trapped by performance. The pickle man setup could have gone sitcom-broad in lesser hands. Instead the film lets the social and emotional awkwardness breathe. That is why Crossing Delancey feels so rich. It is not just about choosing between two men. It is about choosing between two versions of adulthood, one curated and impressive, one more ordinary and maybe more real.
5 'The Truth About Cats & Dogs' (1996)
Image via 20th Century StudiosThis movie is so much smarter than people give it credit for. The premise already sounds like a romantic comedy pressure cooker, a radio host with low self-esteem uses her glamorous friend as a physical stand-in for a man she connected with over the phone, but what makes it work is how cruelly and accurately it understands comparison. And instead of abstract insecurity, it’s about comparison. The constant, exhausting way people build a second self out of what they imagine others would prefer.
Abby Barnes (Janeane Garofalo) is shy, funny, intelligent, competent, and still unable to believe those things can fully compete with visible beauty inside the romantic marketplace. That is why the movie hits. It knows the central deception is not only plot. It is psychological truth externalized. Noelle Slusarsky (Uma Thurman) is perfect for this too because the film never makes her just the pretty obstacle. She has her own loneliness, her own softness, her own sense of being read superficially by the world. So the triangle never becomes morally easy. And Brian (Ben Chaplin) works because the movie lets him feel genuinely drawn to both the mind he has met and the body he thinks belongs to it. That complication is the whole movie’s pulse. The Truth About Cats & Dogs is romantic, yes, but it is also painfully alert to how desirability scrambles identity.
4 'The Baxter' (2005)
Image via IFC FilmsI will always go to bat for The Baxter because it understands one of the saddest truths in romantic comedy history: some people are structurally written to lose the girl in other people’s movies. That is such a funny, weird, secretly heartbreaking idea, and Michael Showalter milks it beautifully. Elliot Sherman (Michael Showalter) is the safety choice male lead. The nice guy who seems right on paper. The fiancé who exists in the final act so the heroine can realize she is meant for somebody else.
Most movies do not care what that person’s interior life feels like. The Baxter cares, and that is what makes it special. It is a meta-romantic comedy, yes, but it is never only clever about genre. It is emotionally invested in what repeated almost-love does to a person’s sense of worth. Elliot is so desperate to perform stability and likability that the performance itself becomes part of his sadness. Then along comes Michelle Williams in exactly the kind of role that can make a movie feel lighter just by entering the frame, and suddenly the film becomes about whether someone like Elliot can stop auditioning to be chosen and actually become emotionally present enough to choose. That is lovely.
3 'Truly, Madly, Deeply' (1990)
Image via The Samuel Goldwyn CompanyTruly, Madly, Deeply is one of the rare ghost romances that genuinely understands the cruelty of recovery. This is one of the most emotionally devastating romantic films ever made because it understands that grief is possessive. Nina (Juliet Stevenson) is not just mourning Jamie. She is living in the afterlife of their relationship so completely that ordinary life has started feeling like betrayal. Then he comes back, and the movie turns it into a confrontation with mourning itself. What did she lose? What did she idealize? What did she freeze in amber because the person was gone and could no longer complicate the memory? That is the genius of the film.
The ghost is there to destabilize grief’s version of love. And because Jamie (Alan Rickman) brings so much warmth and wit and quiet exasperating humanity, the movie gets even sadder. He is lovable enough to justify her attachment and ordinary enough to make that attachment impossible to sustain as pure fantasy. That is what lifts Truly, Madly, Deeply into greatness.
2 'Love Jones' (1997)
Image via New Line CinemaThis is one of the most alive romantic films of the 1990s and it should be spoken about with far more reverence than it usually is. Love Jones gets something right that most romances either overpolish or completely miss: attraction between two intelligent, stylish, emotionally unfinished adults can be thrilling, frustrating, seductive, immature, generous, selfish, poetic, and badly timed all at once. The film follows Darius Lovehall (Larenz Tate) and Nina Mosley (Nia Long) and they’re two very specific people who want each other and still keep getting snagged on who they are when desire is not enough to solve the rest.
And the film’s texture is such a huge part of its greatness. The nightlife, the poetry, the music, the circles of friends, the flirtation as performance and sincerity interwoven, it all gives the romance an environment rather than just a sequence of scenes. That environment matters because the movie is really about emotional rhythm, how two people can be on the same wavelength in one moment and entirely out of phase in the next. Tate and Long are incredible partly because neither of them tries to smooth that out. They let attraction stay messy. They let pride and confusion and bad timing keep interrupting what could otherwise become some polished movie-love fantasy. That mess is exactly what makes Love Jones feel so true and so sexy.
1 'The Lunchbox' (2013)
Image via Sony Pictures ClassicsThis is number one because it understands something profound and almost unbearably tender about romance: sometimes love begins not with spectacle, not with chemistry in a room, not even with faces meeting, but with attention. Real attention. A wrong lunchbox gets delivered, notes start passing between two strangers, and suddenly the movie is inside one of the most delicate emotional premises imaginable. Ila (Nimrat Kaur) and Saajan (late Irrfan Khan) are not exactly young but inside lives shaped by disappointment, routine, grief, domestic invisibility, and the quiet ways a person can stop feeling seen while still technically remaining present in every room they are expected to occupy.
That is why the movie hurts so beautifully. Every letter becomes more intimate because it is crossing into spaces where speech had already failed. Food, routine, train schedules, office fatigue, apartment loneliness, all these ordinary structures become channels for emotional revelation. Khan was extraordinary. Kaur did something just as difficult, she lets hope emerge in a person who knows enough about life to fear hope’s cost. The film never cheapens what grows between them by forcing it into easy rom-com release. It understands that longing itself can be transformative, that being known by one person, even briefly, even imperfectly, can change the emotional contour of a life. That is romance in its purest form to me. That is why it is number one.
Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?
Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.
🪜Parasite
🌀Everything Everywhere
☢️Oppenheimer
🐦Birdman
🪙No Country for Old Men
FIND YOUR FILM →
01
What kind of film experience do you actually want? The best movies don't just entertain — they leave something behind.
ASomething that pulls the rug out — that makes me think I'm watching one kind of film and then reveals I'm watching another entirely. BSomething overwhelming — funny, sad, absurd, and genuinely moving, all at once. CSomething grand and weighty — a film that makes me feel the full scale of what I'm watching. DSomething formally daring — a film that pushes what cinema can even do. ESomething lean and relentless — pure tension with no wasted frame.
NEXT QUESTION →
02
Which idea grabs you most in a film? Great films are driven by a central obsession. What's yours?
AClass, inequality, and what people are willing to do when desperation meets opportunity. BIdentity, family, and the chaos of trying to hold your life together when everything is falling apart. CGenius, moral responsibility, and the catastrophic weight of a decision you can never take back. DEgo, legacy, and the terror of becoming irrelevant while you're still alive to watch it happen. EEvil, chance, and whether moral order actually exists or if we just tell ourselves it does.
NEXT QUESTION →
03
How do you like your story told? Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.
AGenre-twisting — I want it to start in one lane and migrate into something completely different. BMaximalist and genre-blending — comedy, action, drama, sci-fi, all in one ride. CEpic and non-linear — cutting between timelines, building a mosaic of cause and consequence. DA single unbroken flow — I want to feel like I'm living it in real time, no cuts to safety. ESpare and precise — every scene doing exactly what it needs to do and nothing more.
NEXT QUESTION →
04
What makes a truly great antagonist? The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?
AA system — invisible, structural, and almost impossible to fight because it has no single face. BThe self — the ways we sabotage, abandon, and fail the people we love most. CHistory — the unstoppable momentum of events that no single person can stop or redirect. DThe industry — the machinery of culture that chews up talent and spits out irrelevance. EPure, implacable evil — a force so certain of itself it becomes almost philosophical.
NEXT QUESTION →
05
What do you want from a film's ending? The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?
AShock and inevitability — a conclusion that recontextualises everything that came before it. BEarned emotion — I want to cry, laugh, and feel genuinely hopeful, even if the world is a mess. CDevastation and grandeur — an ending that makes me sit in silence for a few minutes after. DAmbiguity — something that leaves enough open that I'm still thinking about it days later. EBleakness — an honest refusal to pretend the world is tidier than it actually is.
NEXT QUESTION →
06
Which setting pulls you in most? Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what's even possible.
AA gleaming modern city with a hidden underside — beauty masking rot, wealth masking desperation. BA collapsing suburban life that opens onto something infinite — the multiverse of a single ordinary person. CThe corridors of power and science at a world-historical turning point — where decisions echo for decades. DThe grimy, alive chaos of New York and Hollywood — fame as both destination and trap. EVast, indifferent landscape — desert and highway where violence arrives without warning or reason.
NEXT QUESTION →
07
What cinematic craft impresses you most? Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.
AProduction design and mise-en-scène — every frame composed to carry meaning beneath the surface. BEditing and tonal control — the ability to move between registers without losing the audience. CScore and sound design — music that becomes inseparable from the dread and awe of what you're watching. DCinematography as performance — the camera not recording events but participating in them. ESilence and restraint — what's left unsaid and unshown doing more work than any dialogue could.
NEXT QUESTION →
08
What kind of main character do you root for? The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.
ASomeone smart and resourceful who makes increasingly dangerous decisions under pressure. BSomeone overwhelmed and ordinary who turns out to be capable of something extraordinary. CA brilliant, tortured figure whose gifts and flaws are inseparable from each other. DA self-destructive artist whose ego is both their superpower and their undoing. EA quiet, principled person trying to make sense of a world that has stopped making sense.
NEXT QUESTION →
09
How do you feel about a film that takes its time? Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.
AI love a slow build when I know the payoff is going to be seismic — patience for a devastating reveal. BGive me relentless momentum — I want to feel breathless and emotionally spent by the end. CEpic runtime doesn't scare me — if the material demands three hours, give me three hours. DI want it to feel propulsive even when nothing is technically happening — restless energy throughout. EDeliberate and unhurried — I want dread to accumulate in the spaces between the action.
NEXT QUESTION →
10
What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema? The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?
AUnsettled — like I've just seen something I can't fully explain but can't stop thinking about. BMoved and energised — like the film reminded me what actually matters and gave me something to hold onto. CHumbled — like I've been in the presence of something genuinely important and overwhelming. DExhilarated — like I've just seen cinema doing something it's never quite done before. EHaunted — like a cold, quiet dread that stays with me for days.
REVEAL MY FILM →
The Academy Has Decided Your Perfect Film Is…
Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.
Parasite
You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho's Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it's ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.
Everything Everywhere All at Once
You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels' Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn't want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it's about.
Oppenheimer
You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.
Birdman
You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it's about. Alejandro González Iñárritu's Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor's ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn't be possible. Michael Keaton's performance and Emmanuel Lubezki's restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.
No Country for Old Men
You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers' No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.
↻ RETAKE THE QUIZ
The Lunchbox
Release Date September 20, 2013
Runtime 104 minutes
Director Ritesh Batra
Writers Ritesh Batra, Rutvik Oza




English (US) ·